CLARITY Act Stalled: Why Crypto Firms Should Stop Waiting

For two years the answer to “where should we license?” from US-facing crypto businesses has included some version of let’s see what Congress does. As the Senate heads into its August recess, that answer has quietly stopped being defensible. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has been sitting on the Senate calendar since 1 June with no floor vote scheduled, and the market’s own estimate of its chances has collapsed by more than two-thirds since February.

This is not a story about whether the bill is good policy. It is a story about whether it is a planning assumption — and the numbers say it no longer is.

Where the bill actually is

It helps to separate genuine progress from the appearance of it. The CLARITY Act has moved further than any previous US crypto market-structure effort, and that is real. The House passed it on 17 July 2025 by 294–134, with more than seventy Democrats crossing over — a genuinely bipartisan margin. The Senate Banking Committee advanced it on 14 May 2026 by 15–9. On 1 June 2026 it was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar as Calendar No. 423.

And then it stopped. A bill on the calendar is a bill that is eligible for floor time, not one that has been given any. Two months on there is no cloture motion, no scheduled debate, and no date. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has pointed to nominations, Russia sanctions legislation and other business ahead of it, and has indicated the bill will not reach the floor before the recess beginning around 7 August.

The arithmetic that is actually blocking it

Strip away the commentary and the obstacle is a vote count. Republicans hold 53 seats. Cloture requires 60. That gap has to be closed with roughly seven to ten Democratic votes, and the supply is moving in the wrong direction.

Two Democrats — Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks — appear committed. Against that, three senators moved into formal opposition after the merged Senate draft dropped an ethics provision restricting senior officials with crypto holdings, a provision Democratic negotiators had treated as a precondition. Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen and Jeff Merkley are now on record against.

So the bill needs to gain seven to ten votes from a caucus in which the most recent movement was three votes away. The unresolved items are not technical drafting points either — they are the ethics provision, DeFi protections, and the level of Democratic support needed to make the whole thing viable. Those are the kind of disagreements that get resolved by a change in political circumstances, not by another month of negotiation.

What the market thinks — and why that number matters

The most useful signal here is not a lobbyist’s forecast; it is money. On 30 July, Polymarket priced 2026 passage at roughly 28%, down from about 82% in February. Galaxy Digital independently cut its estimate to around 30%.

A drop from 82% to 28% in five months is not noise. It is the market repricing a legislative outcome from “expected” to “unlikely,” and it happened while the bill was formally making progress. That divergence — procedural advancement alongside collapsing odds — is precisely what a stalled bill looks like from the outside.

What this means for your licensing decision

Here is the practical translation, and it is short.

Stop pricing US federal clarity into 2026 plans. If your structure, your fundraising deck or your product roadmap assumes a defined US market-structure regime this year, it is assuming a roughly one-in-three outcome. Rebuild the plan so it works if nothing passes, and treat passage as upside.

License where the rules are operable now. The contrast with Europe is stark. MiCA went from law to a hard, enforced deadline: the transitional period closed on 1 July 2026 with no extension, and firms know exactly what is required. Dubai’s VARA publishes rulebooks you can build against today. Whatever the friction, an operable standard beats a pending one — we set the two side by side in VARA versus the EU CASP regime.

Recognise that this is the same pattern, not a new one. The GENIUS Act was signed into law and still is not operable a year later because the implementing rules remain proposals — we covered that gap in our GENIUS Act analysis. US crypto policy has now produced one law that passed but cannot be built against, and one bill that can be built against but has not passed. Neither is a foundation.

Decide your regime on the merits, not on the wait. If EU access matters, the CASP route is the question; if it does not, an offshore VASP framework may serve better and cost far less. Our EU CASP versus offshore VASP comparison covers that fork honestly, and the best crypto licences for 2026 roundup ranks the live options by what they actually let you do.

And whichever way you go, treat banking as the binding constraint rather than an afterthought. Regulatory uncertainty in the largest market makes banking partners more cautious, not less, and fiat rails are where crypto businesses actually fail. Our crypto-friendly banking guide sets out what genuinely works — EMIs and specialist neobanks rather than mainstream processors, which prohibit this vertical outright.

The honest read

The CLARITY Act is not dead. Bills sit on calendars and then move when the politics shift, and a 28% chance is not zero. But it has no floor date, it needs votes from a direction that just moved against it, and the Senate is about to lose a month to recess.

None of that is a reason for despair — it is a reason to stop waiting. The firms that have done well through this period are the ones that picked a live regime, built to its standard, got banked, and left a slot in the plan for US rules to arrive later. The ones still holding structural decisions open pending Congress have now been waiting two years for a bill whose own market odds have fallen by two-thirds.

If you are making that call this quarter and want it mapped against a regime that works today rather than one that might, book a free consultation and we will set out the realistic routes, with government and service costs shown separately. This is licensing and structuring guidance, not investment or legal advice on US legislation.

Christina S.

Crypto Licensing · Vantegris

Part of the Vantegris desk that runs these licences end to end — writing from live applications across 40+ jurisdictions, not recycled marketing. Reviewed by Vladyslav S. (Compliance & Legal).

Full profile Book a free consultation

This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal, tax or financial advice. Consult a qualified professional before acting.